Showing posts with label music. Show all posts
Showing posts with label music. Show all posts
Saturday, April 5, 2014
Music
My review of Music (Stories Like These and Griffin Independent) is now up. Check out what I thought here. (Sadly, it wasn't my favourite.)
Sunday, December 1, 2013
Jedward
Jedward played the Regal Theatre in Perth on November 23, the Palais
Theatre in Melbourne on November 30, and the Enmore Theatre in Sydney on 1
December 2013. And they are JEPIC.
I did not go to this show with the intention of reviewing
it. I was certainly not there in my Important Official Reviewer Capacity™ and I
have absolutely no idea of how to review music. But as there were nowhere near
enough people at this show as it deserved, I feel like I have to write
something about it as a public service. Because if you haven’t heard Jedward,
you are missing out on something. Listening to their music is like being exploded
out of a volcano of joy and excitement and surfing down a wave of sparkly lava.
The sparkles are important. Watch this. I’ll wait.
If you are one of the uninitiated and are like, “um, what is
this Jedward of which you speak?” I am here to help. Jedward are John and
Edward Grimes, identical twins from Ireland with very tall hair. They started
out when they were only 17 on Britain’s version of The X Factor, on which Simon Cowell described them as “not very
good and incredibly annoying”. (To which I say, um, Simon Cowell? How about NO?
How about SHUT UP? How about WHY DO YOU HATE HAPPINESS, SIMON COWELL?) They
finished sixth, got picked up by a record label, and since then have released
three albums: Planet Jedward, an
album of covers, and Victory and Young Love, which are their own stuff.
And if you’re like, “hmmm, these guys look familiar, but I
don’t watch British X Factor in
account of, you know, being in Australia and all”, then you probably saw them
in the Eurovision Song Contest, where they represented Ireland in 2011 and
2012. AND THEY WERE ROBBED BOTH YEARS OMG. (I heard a rumour that if they’d won
selection for 2013, they would have sung Happens
in the Dark. It would have been way more awesome than the bullshit entry
Ireland put up this year. Silly people.)
Eurovision was where I first encountered Jedward. If you don’t
know me personally, then you might not know that Eurovision is my favourite
televisual event of the year, to the extent that I lock myself away for three
days, sans Internet, so no one spoils the results for me. I fell in love
instantly when I saw Jedward. They are everything Eurovision should be – crazy costumes,
crazy hair, and incredible enthusiasm, with wacky special effects and key
changes. AND SERIOUSLY THEY ARE SO HAPPY HOW COULD YOU NOT LOVE THEM. I defy
anyone to listen to Waterline and not
be cheered up at least fifty percent.
That is why I still love them. I don’t make a practice of
going around listening to the back catalogues of Eurovision entrants unless
they’re pretty damned spectacular, but Jedward are. (The other entrant I love
outside of Eurovision now? Cezar the Voice, who represented Romania this year.
Check him out.) Jedward’s music is like a happiness explosion. Whenever I’m in
a tough spot with my thesis or I need cheering up in general, I either hit the
eighties music or I crank up Jedward. They have never once failed me. Even
their songs about sad things like breaking up are still incredibly cheerful – I
mean, check out their latest single, Can’t
Forget You. (I’m not sure if it’s actually a “single” or “song they’ve most
recently made a video clip to”, but whatever.)
Perhaps unsurprisingly, while listening to Jedward is one of
the best ways to lift your mood ever, actually going to one of their concerts
is ELEVENTY BAZILLION TIMES BETTER. I saw them with my sister at the Enmore
Theatre, and it was pathetically empty. But it was fine, because there was all
the more room to dance. And dance I did. I am writing this the next day
sprawled over my couch because I’m in pain from dancing too hard. All you
people of Sydney that were doing things like “not being at Jedward” on Sunday
night MISSED OUT, because there’s no way your evening was as fun as mine.
And you also missed out on touching their famous hair, too. (Then they brought out a can of hairspray and fixed their coiffes on stage, and it was the most gorgeous thing ever.)
Jedward played the Enmore like it was a packed out stadium. There were no support acts – just two and a
half hours of these boys leaping about and doing cartwheels and belting out
tunes of such spectacular cheerfulness I’m going to be smiling for at least a
week. When they ran off to change costumes, they played little videos of themselves and their adventures that just... awww... bless their hearts. I adore them so much. (I would like it noted that I got 100% in the quiz in the Jedward trivia video, because who do you think you're dealing with here?) I've never seen anyone deal more good-naturedly with stage invaders, either. And one of them – I think it was Edward, but it’s hard to tell these
things – was, like, totally singing to me in one of the choruses of Luminous. OMG.
Jedward’s original songs are about one third about girls,
one third about being famous, and one third about outer space – sometimes about
all three at the same time, sprinkled liberally with mentions of social media. They
played a good mix of all three, mixed in with a bunch of covers. If there was
one complaint I had, it’s that they played a few too many covers, when they could
have been playing some of their INCREDIBLY PSYCHED original material, but that
said, they have good taste in covers. They opened up with Icona Pop’s I Love It and it was perf. And then they
launched straight into my ABSOLUTE FAVOURITE of their songs, What’s Your Number?, and I knew it was
going to be a great night.
Hey girl, what’s your
name? what’s your number?
Do you have a
boyfriend? You look like you need one
Hey girl, it’s okay,
it’s okay
Just make him your ex,
then – I can be your next one!
WHOOOOOOOA
What’s your number,
girl?
LYRICAL GENIUS. This song is my ringtone. No regrets.
The crowd was about 40% teenage and tweenage girls, 40%
their parents, 10% hipster dudes, and 10% Eurovision fans. (Arguably, my sister
and I fit into the last category, but I would put us in the separate category
of TRUE DEVOTED JEDHEADS.) And everyone had an absolute blast, perhaps no one
more so than the Jedward boys themselves. They mixed up the faster numbers with
slower ones – probably to give themselves a bit of a breather more than
anything else, because they are energetic dancers, yo. And they played a few
acoustic numbers where John pulled out his guitar, including quite a lovely
rendition of Delilah, and... who am I
kidding. Even their slower numbers are incredibly psyched.
Jedward will be releasing another album soon-ish, which they’re
hoping will be their massive global breakthrough. Personally, I don’t know why
they aren’t already huuuuuuuuuge, because their music is the most incredibly
cheerful thing in the entire world. When they come back to Australia – and I’m
sure they will, bless their hearts – you are a fool if you don’t go. They are
hella excellent performers, the most enthusiastic dancers ever, and they have
the best collection of sparkly jackets in the entire world. AND JUST LISTEN TO
THEIR MUSIC IT IS SO CATCHY AND HAPPY.
Five million out of ten, boys.
Thursday, March 17, 2011
Secret Bridesmaids' Business
Secret Bridesmaids' Business runs until 19 March at Canberra Repertory Society, Theatre 3, Ellery Crescent, Acton, ACT. By Elizabeth Coleman, directed by Geoffrey Borny.I should probably start this piece with an admission. I have pretty close ties to Canberra Rep and I know nearly all of the people in this piece. So if you are looking for objective reviewing, this is probably not the review for you. This said, I'll try and give my honest opinion of the show.
On the whole, I think it's a very well performed show, but it's built on a rotting foundation - the script is really... not good. I love the concept. I love the ideas. I find the idea of chickli
t for the stage very appealing. I find the idea of any genre fiction for the stage very appealing, which is why I liked Quack at Griffin Theatre last year so much. But as a script, Secret Bridesmaids' Business just does not work for me.It's about half an hour too long and a lot of the jokes - and there are jokes, which I think the cast made a really good job of - are obscured by too much dialogue. There should be serious questions underpinning even the fluffiest of entertainment, and Secret Bridesmaids' Business certainly has one of these - if it were you, and your fiance were having an affair, and you were getting married in twelve hours... would you want to know?
Unfortunately, there was simply too much stuff in this play for that question to get adequately answered. I appreciate - and respect - that Coleman was trying to give all six of her characters clear and separate motivations. But in doing so, she's obscuring the key question of the play, which is deep and serious and ultimately tragic. And great humour arises out of great tragedy, and so we don't get a sense of either.
The thing that really doesn't work for me at all is the monologues that Coleman has given each character. They function as an alienation device: which is fair enough, theatrically - that's an option you have open to you. But they break the 'show, don't tell' rule on the most fundamental level, and I honestly don't think the show would have lost that much if you left them out. I think that in the second act they're meant to redeem the two characters who are the most unlikeable - James, the cheating groom, and Naomi, the other woman. With the latter, it succeeds to a degree; with the former, not so much. But any sentiments that Coleman was dying to get out in these monologues, I think she could have done through dialogue. They're awkward, they break the flow, and seriously? if you wanted a scene change, a lighting change or a blackout would have done.
All this said - and even though I am good friends with most of the cast, I say this honestly - the cast do a really good job of what is an achingly clunky script. The standout and showstealer is Anita Davenport as Lucy, who does a stellar job. Lainie Hart is also excellent as the bride Meg, and the rest of the cast - Heather Spong as Angela, Alex de Totth as Naomi, Trish Kelly as the mother Colleen and Martin Searles as the groom James - all do very well indeed. There's no weak link casting-wise, though the show does get off to a very nervous start and doesn't really crank into gear until Lucy enters (about ten or fifteen minutes in).
No, the problems of this show lie in the script, front and centre. This show has all the right ingredients for a fun night out - chicklitty fluff with an excellent cast. You should not be thinking 'when is this going to end?' And I was.
I like Coleman's ambiguous ending - I won't give it away, but it's pretty decent - but I wish it was more ambiguous. I think there's obvious signs as to which way Meg chooses, and I think the show would be far more effective if it were less clear. It would certainly provide more food for thought. And it would be even better if the show were half an hour shorter. Honestly, if you took a brutal red pen to this show, then you might come up with something half as long and twice as good.Right. Enough harping on the script. The set is very good and highly functional and the costumes are extremely effective - the bridesmaid dresses strike just the right level of total fugly. The bridal gown is also very appropriate (though I did notice it needs to be ironed!) And wherever Meg and Lucy buy their clothes, I want to shop there. I saw this show twice - on preview night and then again on the Wednesday of the final week - and the technical hitches that were there during preview had been fixed by the second viewing, which I was glad to see. (No surprise blackouts in the middle of scenes = good times.)

The one thing, production-wise, which really does let the show down is the music. When you walk in, you'd be forgiven you were going in to a stage version of a Hornblower novel. It's all terribly naval and British, and although I think it was supposed to be a wedding march, I just wanted to salute. Also, there's this one piece which played during interval which seriously sounded like it should be in a Hammer Horror movie. Considering that this show is pretty much the opposite of Gothic, that's something that needs to... considered. And there was totally a golden opportunity here to use all those cheesy wedding songs that everyone hates - all that Celine Dion and Shania Twain and... hell, you could have used the nutbush. Missed opportunity, I think. (This idea was not mine, though I wish it was. The trashy wedding song notion belongs wholly to my friend Rashmi. But that picture of Celine is ALL ME.)
I really wanted to like this show. I think the cast is great and sound aside, I think the production values of this show are pretty good, especially considering it's amateur. But seriously, this script has problems. People should really think twice before performing it - or at least bring a red pen and be prepared to use it. Chicklit for the stage is a great idea. But just because it's fluffy doesn't mean it doesn't have to be punchy.
Labels:
Alex de Totth,
Anita Davenport,
Canberra Repertory,
chicklit,
genre fiction,
Geoffrey Borny,
Griffin Theatre,
Heather Spong,
Lainie Hart,
Martin Searles,
music,
theatre,
Trish Kelly,
weddings
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)